LETTER TO EDITOR
|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 127-128
Immediate switching from a chrono to an extended-release formulation of divalproex sodium: A two-part study in patients with controlled epilepsy
Rakesh Shukla1, Sanjay Prakash2, Asad Abbas1
1 Department of Neurology, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University (Erstwhile King George's Medical University), Lucknow - 226 003, India
2 Department of Neurology, Government Medical College, Baroda, India
Department of Neurology, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University (Erstwhile King George's Medical University), Lucknow - 226 003
|How to cite this article:|
Shukla R, Prakash S, Abbas A. Immediate switching from a chrono to an extended-release formulation of divalproex sodium: A two-part study in patients with controlled epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2008;11:127-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Shukla R, Prakash S, Abbas A. Immediate switching from a chrono to an extended-release formulation of divalproex sodium: A two-part study in patients with controlled epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2013 May 18];11:127-8. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2008/11/2/127/41886
Compliance to the prescribed therapy is important in the treatment of epilepsy and is inversely proportional to the number of drug doses per day. , Most physicians have an apprehension that extended-release (ER) formulations may not maintain the blood levels of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) throughout the day. Previous studies have suggested that the total daily dose of sodium valproate is required to be increased by 8-20% while switching from the chrono to the ER formulation. ,
We carried out an open-label prospective study to examine the efficacy of the ER sodium valproate in the management of epilepsy. The study was conducted in two parts. We included patients with epilepsy who were administered a stable mono therapy for at least six months, those administered a chrono preparation of sodium valproate twice a day and those with no seizures in the previous three months. Subjects receiving poly therapy, those with a history of status epilepticus and pregnant or lactating females were excluded.
In part I of the study, the daily dose of the ER divalproate was 25% more than that of chrono preparation of sodium valproate, while in part II of the study, the daily dose of divalproex sodium ER was similar to the total daily dose of chrono preparation of sodium valproate. The patients under study were prescribed a single dose of the commercially available ER divalproate in the morning and were advised to record any adverse effects or seizure recurrence in a diary. The patients were evaluated on day 1 (first visit), day 7 (second visit) and day 90 (third visit). A predose (trough) blood level of sodium valproate in the patients was estimated on all three visits by chemiluminescence technique. ,
In part I study, 24 patients were enrolled of which 18 completed the study. In part II study, 20 patients were enrolled of which 19 completed the 3-month follow-up visit. The demographic characteristics of the study population are given in [Table 1]. In part I study, one patient had a generalized seizure after being administered the ER preparation, which was probably related to sleep deprivation. The remaining 17 patients were seizure free during the 3-month follow-up. In part II study, none of the 19 patients had any seizure during the 3-month follow-up.
The serum valproate levels are depicted in [Table 2]. In part I study, serum valproate levels were significantly higher on days 7 and 90 under ER divalproate treatment than the baseline levels on day 1 under treatment with the chrono preparation. The higher blood levels could be attributed to the 25% increase in the total daily dose of the drug during switching from the chrono to the ER preparation. It has been reported that ER divalproex sodium has a lower bioavailability than the conventional delayed-release formulation; however, studies recommending a higher divalproex sodium ER daily dose were performed on normal healthy volunteers. ,, Whether these apply to clinical settings such as epilepsy require further studies.
In part II study, wherein the total daily dose of the ER divalproate and chrono preparation were the same, no significant difference was observed in serum valproate levels on days 7 and 90 as compared to that on day 1. The baseline serum valproate level on day 1 while the patient was administered chrono preparation was measured approximately 12 h after the last dose; on the other hand, those on days 7 and 90 while the patients were taking ER preparation were done approximately 24 h after the last dose. Studies in persons with epilepsy  and psychiatric disorders  also have shown that ER single dose divalproate (without additional increment in daily dose) can maintain the same or higher blood level of valproate as achieved with delayed ER formulations. Unlike a previous study conducted on a small sample size (5 subjects) for a shorter duration (60 days), our study was conducted on a larger number of subjects (20 patients) for a longer duration (90 days). Fallacies in the timing of blood sampling (trough versus peak) could be attributed to the relatively lower blood levels of valproate reported in some of the previous studies where the blood levels achieved with the ER (single dose) have been compared with delayed-release (DR; twice daily dose) formulations. 
The patients had significantly less headache while on ER formulation than that while on DR formulation. It is possible that the improvement in headache may be associated with more stable blood levels of the drug achieved with the ER formulation. Tremor of hands, gastric upset and aggression were less during the intake of ER preparation than that during the intake of DR preparation in both studies; however, there was no significant difference between the two formulations. There was no significant change in body weight (49.9 kg on chrono preparation and 49.1 kg on ER preparation in part I study; 50.1 kg on chrono preparation and 50.4 kg on ER preparation in part II study). Our results indicate that switching over from the chrono to ER formulation without dose escalation is safe and effective.
| References|| |
|1.||Cramer JA, Mattson RH, Prevey ML, Scheyer RD, Ouellette VL. How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique. JAMA 1989;261:3273-7. |
|2.||Garnett WR. Antiepileptic drug treatment: outcomes and adherence. Pharmacotherapy 2000;20:S191-5. |
|3.||Dutta S, Reed RC. Divalproex to divalproex extended release conversion. Clin Drug Invest 2004;24:495-508. |
|4.||Dutta S, Zhang Y, Selness DS, Lee LL, Williams LA, Sommerville KW. Comparison of the bioavailability of unequal doses of divalproex sodium extended release formulation relative to the delayed release formulation in healthy volunteers. Epilepsy Res 2002;49:1-10. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|5.||Rajesh B, Ashalatha R, Sarma P, Sankara, Radhakrishnan K. An assessment of the clinical equivalence of valproate chrono and extended release divalproex formulations. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2007;3:169-74. |
|6.||Horne RL, Cunenan C. Safety and efficacy of switching psychiatric patients from a delayed release to an extended release formulation of divalproex sodium. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2003;23:176-81. |
|7.||Thibault M, Blume WT, Saint-Hilaire JM Zakhari R, Sommerville KW. Divalproex extended release versus the original divalproex tablet: Results of a randomized, cross- over study of well controlled epileptic patients with primary generalized seizures. Epilepsy Res 2002;50:243-9. |
[Table 1], [Table 2]