Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 6139 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size

Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 455-456
 

Comment on "Pathophysiology of migraine" by professor PJ Goadsby in August 2012 edition of Ann Indian Acad Neurol


Research Department, The Headache Clinic and Migraine Research Institute, Suite 243, P Bag X2600, Houghton, 2041, South Africa

Date of Web Publication26-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Elliot Shevel
The Headache Clinic and Migraine Research Institute, Suite 243, P Bag X2600, Houghton, 2041
South Africa
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.116946

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Shevel E. Comment on "Pathophysiology of migraine" by professor PJ Goadsby in August 2012 edition of Ann Indian Acad Neurol. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2013;16:455-6

How to cite this URL:
Shevel E. Comment on "Pathophysiology of migraine" by professor PJ Goadsby in August 2012 edition of Ann Indian Acad Neurol. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Nov 13];16:455-6. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2013/16/3/455/116946


Sir,

In his article "Pathophysiology of migraine," in the Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012 August; 15(Suppl 1):S15-S22, [1] Following points need serious consideration:

  1. The author stated "Vascular changes are unrelated to the phase of the attack; indeed blood flow could be reduced or normal during the pain phase." To support this statement, he cited the research carried out by Olesen and the "Copenhagen Group." It is true that the Copenhagen Group found that changes in intracranial regional cerebral blood-flow (rCBF) were unrelated to the severity and timing of migraine pain [2] but this study of the Copenhagen Group had no relevance to extracranial vasodilatation. Olesen's group studied rCBF, not the blood-flow of the extracranial arteries. The use of the Copenhagen Group's observations in this context is misleading.
  2. The author has previously claimed, and has now repeated, that migraine occurs without any change in the extracranial vessels. To support this claim, he referred to the work of Schoonman et al., who were able for the first time to accurately measure the diameters of most of the major intracranial and some of the extracranial vessels, both during migraine and interictally, and on left and right sides during unilateral migraine. They showed that none of the vessels measured dilated during migraine. [3] The only part of the extracranial vasculature that Schoonman et al., measured, however, was the last 1 cm of the main trunk of the external carotid artery, which has never been implicated in migraine. Schoonman et al., made no mention of the terminal branches of the external carotid artery as these vessels were not included in their study. The use of Schoonman's study to justify the claim that the terminal branches of the extracranial vessels are not involved in migraine is to misrepresent the results of Schoonman's study.
  3. The third serious misrepresentation concerns the author's claim, that the gepant BIBN4096BS is "without vascular effects." Yes, BIBN4096BS does not actively constrict arteries in healthy volunteers, [4] but that is completely different from being without vascular effects in the context of migraine. To substantiate this claim, the author cited Petersen et al., [4] Petersen's article is unambiguous - it clearly states that BIBN4096BS is "very effective in preventing calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-induced vasodilatation." BIBN4096BS was in fact developed specifically to reverse the vasodilatation caused by the increased CGRP levels during migraine. [5] To cite Petersen's study to justify the claim that BIBN4096BS is without vascular effects is a contradiction.


 
   References Top

1.Goadsby PJ. Pathophysiology of migraine. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2012;15:S15-22.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.Olesen J, Friberg L, Olsen TS, Iversen HK, Lassen NA, Andersen AR, et al. Timing and topography of cerebral blood flow, aura, and headache during migraine attacks. Ann Neurol 1990;28:791-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Schoonman GG, van der Grond J, Kortmann C, van der Geest RJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD. Migraine headache is not associated with cerebral or meningeal vasodilatation: A 3T magnetic resonance angiography study. Brain 2008;131:2192-200.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Petersen KA, Birk S, Lassen LH, Kruuse C, Jonassen O, Lesko L, et al. The CGRP-antagonist, BIBN4096BS does not affect cerebral or systemic haemodynamics in healthy volunteers. Cephalalgia 2005;25:139-47.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Doods H. Development of CGRP antagonists for the treatment of migraine. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2001;2:1261-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    



This article has been cited by
1 The Vasodilatory Activity of CGRP: A Response
Marcelo E. Bigal,Sarah Walter,Alan M. Rapoport
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2014; 54(4): 748
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (403 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1100    
    Printed35    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal