HOW I DO IT
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 286-289
Single small enhancing CT Lesions, with special reference to neurocysticercosis: How I treat
MV Padma Srivastava
Professor, Head Unit III Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
|Date of Submission||03-Jun-2015|
|Date of Decision||15-Jun-2015|
|Date of Acceptance||18-Jun-2015|
|Date of Web Publication||6-Aug-2015|
M V Padma Srivastava
Head Unit III Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110 029
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Single small enhancing CT lesions (SSECTL) have been very commonly encountered in clinical practice.These lesions typically are small (often < 20 mm), enhancing as a ring lesion or a disc and with varying amounts of surrounding edema. Most SSECTL present as focal seizures. Once the diagnosis of SSECTL and likely to be a solitary cysticercus lesion is made, the patient is given appropriate AED therapy. Depending on the resolution pattern on repeat imaging performed at intervals not less than six months if patient remains asymptomatic, cysticidal therapy is instituted along with AEDs. Any deviation from the classical clinical or radiological patterns needs further evaluation and other etiologies described for the SSECTL will need to be ruled out, including that of tuberculosis. Largely these lesions resolve and the clinical condition remains benign and in most patients AEDs can be withdrawn in two to three years period.
Keywords: Cysticercosis, epilepsy, SSECTL
|How to cite this article:|
Padma Srivastava M V. Single small enhancing CT Lesions, with special reference to neurocysticercosis: How I treat. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:286-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Padma Srivastava M V. Single small enhancing CT Lesions, with special reference to neurocysticercosis: How I treat. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 5];18:286-9. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2015/18/3/286/162269
| Introduction|| |
Single small enhancing computed tomography lesions (SSECTL) have been very commonly encountered in clinical practice, ever since they were discovered in the late 1970s following the advent of computed tomography (CT) of the brain. These lesions typically are small (often <20 mm), enhancing as a ring lesion or a disc and with varying amounts of surrounding edema. Usually there is neither any significant midline shift nor enhancing exudates. Very often a concentric dot representing the scolex is visible. The core is hypodense and represents a cystic fluid. Although initially thought to be tubercular in etiology, their spontaneous resolution without antitubercular treatment raised questions regarding their true identity. [Table 1] lists the causes of SSECTL. Therefore, although not necessarily sine qua non with neurocysticercosis, most SSECTL turn out to be cysticercus in nature. 
Most SSECTL present as focal seizures. Epilepsy is the commonest presentation (70-88%), followed by headache (43.4%), papilledema (28%), pyramidal signs (27.2%), cognitive decline (21.5%), ataxia (15.8%), vision loss (10%), and optic atrophy (10%). Uncommon presentations include psychosis, diplopia, vertigo, lower cranial palsies, hypoesthesia, sensorineural deafness, spinal cord compression, meningeal signs, radicular symptoms, and Parinaud's syndrome.
Diagnostic criteria for SSECTL presentation of cysticercosis (solitary cerebral cysticercus granuloma (SCCG)) presenting with seizures.
Patient should have seizures
- There should be no features of persistent increased intracranial pressure.
- There should be no evidence of a progressive neurologic deficit.
- There should be no evidence of a systemic illness such as primary malignancy, pulmonary or systemic tuberculosis, and/or focus of pyogenic infection.
- The lesion should be solitary.
- The lesion should enhance after contrast injection.
- The lesion should measure <20 mm in maximum dimension.
- Edema may or may not be present around the lesion and should not cause midline shift.
These criteria were validated in a prospective study and found to have a sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 98.9%.
Investigations for the etiological diagnosis of SSECTL
Various immunological tests for anti-cysticercal antibodies in serum and cerebrospinal fluid have not been sensitive or specific for diagnosis. Resorting to biopsy of these lesions, which are essentially benign, is not justified.
Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) required?
The most common neuroimaging test is CT brain, considering its availability, accessibility, and economic concerns. Current advanced CT machines have fairly good diagnostic sensitivity. However, small lesions in posterior fossa or close to the bone, or intraventricular or basal cisternal cysts may be missed. MRI has better accuracy, but may miss small calcifications. However, MRI is far more expensive and less available. Hence, it is not mandatory to perform MRI for every case of SSECTL. Follow-up scans for monitoring resolution of the lesion will also be simpler and less expensive with CT.
Management of a Patient Presenting with Ssectl and Seizures
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)
| Choice of AEDs|| |
Any AED (single) which can be used as primary drug for symptomatic epilepsies can be chosen according to patient preference. Most patients (85-90%) respond to a single AED. , AED therapy is the mainstay in the management of patients diagnosed with an SCCG. Monotherapy with a single AED is adequate in > 85% of patients. In my practice, I start either with phenytoin or carbamazepine or levetiracetam according to the affordability, the gender, and other individual preferences as the first-line AED. The usual precautions and counseling with regards to drug compliance is emphasized to the patients and caregivers.
| Duration of AEDs|| |
The consensus is to give the AEDs for a full duration of 2.5 years without seizures and taper and stop over next 6 months. However, some literature does suggest that AEDs can safely be withdrawn within 2-12 weeks of total resolution of the lesion on follow-up neuroimaging.
In a previous study in adults, no difference was seen with albendazole given for 7 days. Spontaneous resolution of the lesion was seen within 3 months in >70% of the cases. , No difference was also noted in children with SSECTL with albendazole treatment. However, further studies showed a better seizure control with albendazole and also better resolution. A more recent study showed a combination of albendazole with praziquantel to be statistically comparable to albendazole alone in resolution of the lesions.  A recent Cochrane review found that for viable lesions in children, there were no major trials and in adults, no difference was detected with albendazole compared to no treatment or with steroids.  The duration of albendazole treatment also varied from 3 days to 1 week to 1 month, with no definitive recommendations of preference of one regime. Cysticial therapy has been associated with headaches, or seizures. I give albendazole for 1 month at a dosage of 15 mg/kg of body weight. I start slow, with half a tablet of albendazole of 400 mg/day and build up gradually every 2 days by 200 mg to full dose. Albendazole is generally given under the cover of steroids which are then tapered rapidly and stopped over a period of 2 weeks' duration.
Role of steroids
Most cases which received steroids do so due to severe headaches or as accompanying drug with albendazole to prevent headaches or seizures when receiving cysticidal therapy.  The duration of steroids is usually short and individualized according to the patient's symptoms.
Once the diagnosis of SSECTL and likely to be a solitary cysticercus lesion is made, the patient is given appropriate AED therapy. CT is repeated at 6 months' interval or earlier if there are unexplained recurrences of seizures, headaches, or other features. The extent of resolution is gauged in the repeat CT. If the resolution is at least 50% and above, no further change in treatment is done and AED therapy is continued. CT is repeated at the end of 6 months. If the lesion if resolved or continues to show more than 50% resolution from previous scan, no further therapy is added and AED is continued. The next CT can be performed at the end of 1 year. The AED therapy can be tapered at the end of 2 or 2.5 years period of seizure-free interval and stopped. In majority of cases, the lesion fully resolves or leaves a calcified spot.
If at the end of 6 months, the repeat CT does not show resolution or is less than <50%, it is termed as "persistent lesion". A course of albendazole is given in such cases (15 mg/kg/day for 1 month in divided doses; gradually increase the dose over 1 week). A short course of steroids is recommended with albendazole or primed before initiating albendazole to prevent headaches or seizures, which can happen on account of increased inflammation due to the dying cyst. The further follow-up will remain similar as described above.
Any deviation from the classical clinical or radiological patterns needs further evaluation and other etiologies described for the SSECTL will need to be ruled out, including that of tuberculosis. At each review, patients should be assessed carefully for new symptoms and signs, especially for raised intracranial pressure or focal neurological deficits or systemic features such as fever, cough, or anorexia. Presence of any of these mandates a repeat fresh evaluation for other etiologies of these lesions.
Surgical therapy is rarely required for these patients. Current indications include an enlarging lesion or a persistent lesion with difficult to control seizures. [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Flow chart of treatment paradigm for SSECTL. SSECTL = Single small enhancing computed tomography lesions, AED = Antiepileptic drug, CECT = Contrast-enhance computed tomography|
Click here to view
In a typical case of SSECTL which is an SCCG, spontaneous resolution of the lesion is the rule, but the rate of resolution is highly variable in individual patients. The seizure outcome is good with >90% of patients remaining seizure-free even after discontinuation of AEDs.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chandy MJ, Rajshekhar V, Ghosh S, Prakash S, Joseph T, Abraham J, et al
. Single small enhancing CT lesions in Indian patients with epilepsy: Clinical, radiological and pathological considerations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1991;54:702-5.
Rajshekhar V, Chandy MJ. Validation of diagnostic criteria for solitary cerebral cysticercus granuloma in patients presenting with seizures. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;96:76-81.
Rajshekhar V. Rate of spontaneous resolution of a solitary cysticercus granuloma in patients with seizures. Neurology 2001;57:2315-7.
Murthy JM, Subba Reddy YV. Prognosis of epilepsy associated with single CT enhancing lesions: A long term follow-up study. J Neurol Sci 1998;159:151-5.
Padma MV, Behari M, Misra NK, Ahuja GK. Albendazole in single CT ring lesions in epilepsy. Neurology 1994;44:1344-6.
Kaur S, Singhi P, Singhi S, Khandelwal N. Combination therapy with albendazole and praziquantel versus albendazole alone in children with seizures and single lesion neurocysticercosis: A randomized placebo-controlled double blind trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:403-6.
Abba K, Ramaratnam S, Ranganathan LN. Anthelminthics for people with neurocysticercosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;3:CD0000215.
Garg RK, Potluri N, Kar AM, Singh MK, Shukla R, Agrawal A, et al
. Short course of prednisolone in patients with solitary cysticercus granuloma: A double blind placebo controlled study. J Infect 2006;53:65-9.