Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 1130 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size

Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 491-492
 

Utility of cerebrospinal fluid cortisol level in acute bacterial meningitis


Department of Paediatrics, Al-Kindy College of Medicine, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq

Date of Submission11-May-2015
Date of Decision01-Oct-2015
Date of Acceptance20-Sep-2015
Date of Web Publication17-Nov-2015

Correspondence Address:
Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi
PO Box - 55302, Baghdad Post Office, Baghdad
Iraq
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.169680

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Dhahir Al-Mendalawi M. Utility of cerebrospinal fluid cortisol level in acute bacterial meningitis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:491-2

How to cite this URL:
Dhahir Al-Mendalawi M. Utility of cerebrospinal fluid cortisol level in acute bacterial meningitis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Nov 14];18:491-2. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2015/18/4/491/169680


Sir,

In their interesting study, Mehta et al. stated that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cortisol levels were significantly higher in the bacterial meningitis (BM) group as compared to the viral meningitis (VM) group. The authors suggested that CSF cortisol may serve as a valuable, rapid, and relatively inexpensive diagnostic marker in discriminating between BM and VM and it can be a useful guide to monitor the response to therapy in BM. [1] I presume that the clinical implication of that suggestion is questionable. This is based on the following three points.

First, the cutoff values of CSF cortisol were not established to be practically implementable in the clinical setting.

Second, lumbar puncture (LP) is a procedure frequently performed in medical practice. Though LP is a safe procedure in experienced hands, families fear having it performed on patients, particularly sick children and refusing to have LP performed is not uncommon. The fear of paralysis and conviction that LP was unnecessary accounted for the majority of the causes for refusal to perform LP. [2] Therefore, it would not be easy to repeatedly take the consent of families for the performance of LP to monitor CSF cortisol response in the therapy on BM.

Third, the use of biological markers including procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proposed to facilitate the accuracy of the initial diagnosis of bacterial infections including meningitis. It is well-known that PCT is an acute-phase protein with faster kinetics than CRP and its concentration in serum rises within a few hours following the inception of a bacterial infection. I presume that serum PCT could be considered as a valuable, practical, and better alternative tool in the clinical setting than CSF cortisol for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes in managing cases of meningitis. This is based on the following three points:

  1. It has been recently found that at an optimum cutoff value of ≥5,000 pg/mL, based on the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, PCT showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5%, 93.5%, 98.6%, and 93.3%, respectively. Serum PCT with cutoff level of 15,000 pg/mL showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 92%, 67%, 91.4%, and 71.4%, respectively, for the differentiation of BM from VM. [3]
  2. Serum PCT level has been noticed to decrease rapidly with appropriate antibiotic treatment and hence, diminishing the value of repeating LP after admission to assess treatment efficacy. [4]
  3. Most recently, serum PCT level has been seen to be related to the severity of disease in patients with BM as PCT levels decreased significantly in patients who had good curative effect, whereas PCT levels did not change in patients who had no curative effect. The levels of PCT were found to be significantly higher in those who died than in those who survived. [5]


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Mehta A, Mahale RR, Sudhir U, Javali M, Srinivasa R. Utility of cerebrospinal fluid cortisol level in acute bacterial meningitis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:210-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Narchi H, Ghatasheh G, Al Hassani N, Al Reyami L, Khan Q. Why do some parents refuse consent for lumbar puncture on their child? A qualitative study. Hosp Pediatr 2012;2:93-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Prasad R, Kapoor R, Mishra OP, Srivastava R, Kant Singh U. Serum procalcitonin in septic meningitis. Indian J Pediatr 2013;80:365-70.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Viallon A, Guyomarc′h P, Guyomarc′h S, Tardy B, Robert F, Marjollet O, et al. Decrease in serum procalcitonin levels over time during treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Crit Care 2005;9:R344-50.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hu R, Gong Y, Wang Y. Relationship of serum procalcitonin levels to severity and prognosis in pediatric bacterial meningitis. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2015;54:1141-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (480 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed828    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded38    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal