Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 7596 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 492-493
 

Errors in conducting screening for mild cognitive impairment with Hindi mental state examination


Department of Community Medicine, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India

Date of Submission16-May-2015
Date of Decision20-Sep-2015
Date of Acceptance20-Sep-2015
Date of Web Publication17-Nov-2015

Correspondence Address:
Sunil Kumar Raina
Department of Community Medicine, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Tanda, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.169681

Rights and Permissions

 



How to cite this article:
Raina SK. Errors in conducting screening for mild cognitive impairment with Hindi mental state examination. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:492-3

How to cite this URL:
Raina SK. Errors in conducting screening for mild cognitive impairment with Hindi mental state examination. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 22];18:492-3. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2015/18/4/492/169681


Sir,

This is with reference to the article entitled "Neuropsychological markers of mild cognitive impairment: A clinic based study from urban India" published in Ann Indian Acad Neurol (2015; 18: 177-80). [1] The authors deserve appreciation for their effort. However, I have a few concerns with this study. The authors stated that it was a cross-sectional study and 42 participants [22 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 20 normal controls (NCs) between the age of 60 years and 80 years] were chosen for the purpose of this study. [1] This statement in itself appears incorrect. A cross-sectional study (also known as prevalence study) is different from a case-control study (also known as case-reference study). Therefore, the usage of these terms is not interchangeable and cannot be used in this manner. Then the authors went on to write that the 22 individuals with MCI and 20 NCs were matched for age and education. This makes the study a matched case-control study and not a cross-sectional one. Importantly, the authors do not seem to have age-matched the individuals with MCI with the NCs. If the authors had individually matched the age, the number of individuals in the two groups would have been similar (20 individuals with MCI and 20 NCs) and not dissimilar (22 individuals with MCI and 20 NCs), as was the case in this study.

This takes me to my second concern with the study. The authors presented the demographic characteristics of those with MCI and the NCs in [Table 1] (reproduced below). A look at the table shows that the mean on the Everyday Abilities Scale of India for MCI is 0.00 and the mean for NC is also 0.00. Surprisingly, the statistical analysis performed on this (mean for MCI and the mean for NC) has a P value of 0.9, which is not possible. This needs a relook on the part of the authors.
Table 1: Table showing the demographic characteristics of the study sample

Click here to view


Lastly, the authors stated that all the study participants were screened with the Hindi mental state examination (HMSE) and Everyday Abilities Scale of India. I am unable to understand the role of screening patients with HMSE. This screening has been conducted on all 42 study participants without assigning a specific role for this screening. The group MCI scored a mean of 28.00 (2.37) while the group NC scored a mean of 30.00 (1.00). The HMSE is a Hindi version of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and uses the same cutoffs for the assessment of cognitive impairment as MMSE (original version). [2] The authors of MMSE recommend that the following cutoff levels be used for classification purposes: Normal cognitive function = 27-30 and MCI = 21-26. Now, if a study participant is defined as normal in the screening test, how could he/she be included in the MCI group?

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Tripathi R, Kumar K, Balachandar R, Marimuthu P, Varghese M, Bharath S. Neuropsychological markers of mild cognitive impairment: A clinic based study from urban India. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:177-80.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Ganguli M, Ratcliff G, Chandra V, Sharma S, Gilby J, Pandav R, et al. A Hindi version of the MMSE: The development of a cognitive screening instrument for a largely illiterate rural elderly population in India. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1995;10:367-77.  Back to cited text no. 2
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (507 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed843    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal