Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 2485 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 37-43
 

Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI


Department of Biophysics, Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Date of Submission02-Apr-2015
Date of Decision01-May-2015
Date of Acceptance05-Jun-2015
Date of Web Publication2-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
Gülsüm Akdeniz
Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biophysics, Eskişehir Yolu, Lodumlu Mevkii, Bilkent-Ankara
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.168632

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background: Few studies have been conducted that have compared electrical source localization (ESL) results obtained by analyzing ictal patterns in scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) with the brain areas that are found to be responsible for seizures using other brain imaging techniques. Additionally, adequate studies have not been performed to confirm the accuracy of ESL methods. Materials and Methods: In this study, ESL was conducted using LORETA (Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography) in 9 patients with lesions apparent on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in 6 patients who did not exhibit lesions on their MRIs. EEGs of patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy and had follow-ups for at least 1 year after operations were analyzed for ictal spike, rhythmic, paroxysmal fast, and obscured EEG activities. Epileptogenic zones identified in postoperative MRIs were then compared with localizations obtained by LORETA model we employed. Results: We found that brain areas determined via ESL were in concordance with resected brain areas for 13 of the 15 patients evaluated, and those 13 patients were post-operatively determined as being seizure-free. Conclusion: ESL, which is a noninvasive technique, may contribute to the correct delineation of epileptogenic zones in patients who will eventually undergo surgery to treat epilepsy, (regardless of neuroimaging status). Moreover, ESL may aid in deciding on the number and localization of intracranial electrodes to be used in patients who are candidates for invasive recording.


Keywords: Epilepsy, epileptogenic zone, LORETA, postoperative MRI, source localization


How to cite this article:
Akdeniz G. Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2016;19:37-43

How to cite this URL:
Akdeniz G. Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 19];19:37-43. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2016/19/1/37/168632



   Introduction Top


Localization of the sources of electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the brain is important in both clinical [1] and basic [2] research. Quantitative localization of EEG brain sources began in the 1950s with investigations to determine the nature of scalp surface potential distributions that reflect sources in the brain. [3],[4]

Electrical source localization (ESL), also known as electrical source imaging, is a model-based imaging technique that integrates temporal and spatial components of EEG to identify the source of electrical potentials recorded on the scalp. [5] ESL techniques have been widely studied and validated for the study of inter-ictal [6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12] and ictal ESL. [13],[14],[15],[16],[17] However, only a few studies have compared the analyses of different types of ictal activity. [18],[19] Although a template head model is generally preferred in ESL studies, individual head models obtained from the patients' own magnetic resonance images (MRIs) are also used. However, constructing an individual head model for a patient to estimate and confirm the epileptogenic zone is an onerous process. [20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30]

The clinical benefits of information derived from ESL were first shown in patients with lesioned epilepsy. [31],[32],[33] Some recent studies have shown furthermore that the brain area causing the seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and extra-temporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) could be determined using ESL, even when the disorder was not detected in MR images. [29],[34] However, very few studies have utilized ESL in recent years to determine the location of the epileptogenic zone in ETLE, especially in cases where MR images appear normal. This can be attributed to the fact that such attempts require well-planned prospective studies, which should be based on long-term surgical outcome and sufficient number of patients in order to be meaningful statistically.

In the present study, ESL was performed using a method called "low-resolution electrical tomography" [35],[36],[37],[38] for the estimation of epileptic zone from different forms of scalp EEG ictal activity. Main goals of the study were:

  1. To assess the contribution of the ESL method for determination of the epileptic zone in patients with and without lesions on MRI;
  2. To determine the impact of using the patient's own MRI scan on the accuracy of ESL; and
  3. To investigate the effect of scalp EEG ictal activity on the performance of ESL.



   Materials and Methods Top


Subjects

The data examined in our study were from 15 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who were candidates for surgery. Informed written consent was obtained from each patient, and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty.

For this study, we used the following inclusion criteria to select patients from our database who:

  1. Had drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
  2. Underwent pre-surgical evaluation and long term video-EEG recording .
  3. Had post-surgical MRI performed according to an epilepsy protocol.
  4. Had surgery and follow-up for at least 14 months.


The characteristics of all the patients are tabulated in [Table 1]. The age range of patients was 5-47 years. (mean: 23.07; median: 23). Five of the patients were female. In pre-surgical evaluations, the epileptogenic zone of 11 participants was described as temporal, and that of four patients was identified as extra-temporal.
Table 1: Characteristics of the patients in terms of gender, age, ictal EEG localization, MRI and PET reports, operation region, pathology result, follow-up time after surgery, and seizure outcome, respectively

Click here to view


The pre-surgical evaluations included neurological examinations, long-term video-EEG monitoring, MRI performed according to an epilepsy protocol, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET), and neuropsychological evaluation. Eight patients underwent a second evaluation phase involving intracranial recording.

EEG scalp/surface recording

Long-term video-EEG recording with 64 scalp electrodes (SynAmps; Compumedics Neuroscan, Charlotte, NC, USA, or SD LTM64 Headbox; Micromed, Italy) was performed on all patients using a standard clinical EEG setup. Electrodes were placed according to the 10-20 montage international system. Impedances were below 5 kΩ. The signal was sampled at 256 Hz and digitized, and the stored data was off-line filtered using 0.5-100 Hz band-pass digital filters.

Scalp-EEG ictal detection, selection, and analysis

Ictal activity was categorized as follows according to the classification of: [18]

  1. Ictal spike activity: A wave in the form of spike recorded during epileptic seizures. Three or more discharges in sequence.
  2. Rhythmic activity: EEG waves (alpha, theta or delta) that is up to 13 Hz frequencies.
  3. Paroxysmal fast activity: The rhythmic activity that is bigger than 13 Hz frequency.
  4. Obscured activity: Pattern evolves from artifact such that precise time, pattern, and distribution of onset was imperceptible.


Advanced Signal Analysis (ASA) software (ANT Software, Enschede, The Netherlands) was used for selection, detection, and analysis of scalp-EEG ictal patterns. For ESL with LORETA analysis, seizures were divided into several events subsequent in time. Time analysis windows of each event ran from the start to the end of the change in amplitude.

Localization of electrode position

The fiducial system was used for localization of EEG electrodes for all patients, which were defined by marker points (the nasion and the right and left tragi) and registered by automatic localization and labeling of EEG sensors in the MRI volume. [39]

MRI and individual head model

MRI scans for all patients were acquired as a part of the post-surgical evaluation with 1.5 T scanners according to an epilepsy protocol. These post-surgical MRI scans were used for obtaining an individual head model for each patient. T1-weighted sequences with pixel size of 0.98 mm 2 , and slice thickness of 1.25 mm were used to obtain three-dimensional (3D) MRIs. In order to construct individual head models, geometrical boundaries of brain were defined using anatomical marker points (nasion, and right and left tragi), which are identical to those used in 3D MRI. The same spatial reference was identified for neurophysiological and structural data. The Boundary Element Method (BEM), being one of the most preferred methods, was also used for individual head models. Based on this method, segments of the three compartment surfaces (brain, skull, and scalp) were described by 4000 nodes per head model. According to this data, a realistic EEG transfer matrix was calculated. ASA software was used for the processes mentioned above. Specific conductivity values attributed to the brain, skull, and scalp of each patient were 0.33, 0.0042, and 0.33 Siemens/meter, respectively.

LORETA

The low resolution electromagnetic tomography method (LORETA) was used to determine brain electrical sources. LORETA is a Laplacian weighted minimum norm algorithm, which depends on the existing neuro-anatomical and physiological knowledge and a mathematical constraint. [40] The method is based on the reconstruction of the electric activity of the brain onto all of the points of a 3D grid. Every point whose activity is reformed is considered to be a potential source localization; therefore, a presumed number of sources is not necessary for the model, unlike dipole source modeling methods. In this method, the smoothest spatial distribution is selected by minimizing the Laplacian of weighted current sources. The assumption is that neighboring voxels should have a maximally similar electrical activity, such as the same orientation and activation. The significant feature of LORETA is that it facilitates inverse solution by providing spatial coefficients as input. This property is coming from the result of its time independency. To generate a combination of sources, it is enough to have one-time sample. Hence, we divided EEG activities into time windows for a solution, and these temporal windows were analyzed between the time of seizure onset and ∼ 4 seconds later.


   Results Top


The LORETA map at the time of visible seizure onset, or appearing at the time of seizure semiology, was selected. The anatomical information obtained from the results of LORETA is given in [Table 2].
Table 2: The anatomical information obtained from the results of ESL method for each participant

Click here to view


Patient classification according to scalp-EEG ictal patterns

The ESL group assessed using scalp EEG ictal spike activity included six patients. Of these, three patients (Patients 6, 11, and 15) were classified as having TLE, and the remaining three patients (Patients 1, 4, and 8) were classified as having ETLE.

The ESL group assessed using scalp EEG rhythmic activity included four patients. One patient (Patient 3) was classified as having ETLE, and the remaining patients (Patients 10, 12 and 13) were determined as having TLE.

The ESL group assessed using scalp EEG paroxysmal fast activity included four patients and all of them (Patients 2, 5, 9, and 14) had TLE.

The ESL group assessed using scalp EEG obscured activity included 1 patient and that person (Patients 7) was classified as having TLE.

ESL results for the patients with MRI lesions

Nine of the postoperative patients with TLE were seizure-free. The epileptogenic zones that were obtained using LORETA method for ESL showed overlap with the resected area [see [Figure 1]].
Figure 1: The superposed images of LORETA source localization maps obtained by analyzing EEG ictal activity and postoperative MRI: Individual head model (dark gray color), including brain, skull and scalp was created using postoperative MRI scans for each patient. Electrode positions were localized, EEG analysis was performed, and electrodes were registered with individual head model. Finally, LORETA method was conducted to obtain ESL map and the highest activation area marked with crosshair. The ESL area we have found using LORETA method overlapped with brain resected area (black) except for the patients #4 and #13

Click here to view


ESL results for the patients without MRI lesions

Two patients with TLE and four patients with ETLE were operated on after intracranial recordings were performed, because their MRIs were normal. For four of these patients, the epileptogenic zones obtained using LORETA corresponded to the resected area. LORETA method used in this study identified an area adjacent to the resected area as being related to the seizure in one patient with TLE [Figure 1], #13]] and in one patient with ETLE [Figure 1], #4]].

The ESL found using LORETA source model identified zones that were wider than the resected area for six patients.

Concordance between Engel classification and ESL

The distribution of patients classified postoperatively according to the Engel classification of outcome is given in [Table 3]. Briefly, 11 patients with TLE, three with parietal lobe epilepsy (PLE), and one with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) were followed-up on over the course of at least 1 year postoperatively. All of these patients were seizure-free and belonged to Engel class I. After their operations, it was confirmed that the source localizations obtained using LORETA coincided with the same zone as the region that caused the seizures in these patients. The zone adjacent to the resected brain area was identified using LORETA for one patient with TLE and one patient with PLE who both had fewer seizures postoperatively.
Table 3: Patient distribution based on postoperative Engel outcome classification

Click here to view


Surgery and histopathology

The resections identified the parietal lobe in three patients, the frontal lobe in one patient, and the temporal lobe for 11 of the 15 patients, and all of them were single-lobe resections. Histopathological analysis of the resected tissue showed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) for eight cases, hippocampal sclerosis for two cases, both FCD and hippocampal sclerosis for two cases, ganglioglioma for one case, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma for one case, and neurofibromatosis for one case.


   Discussion Top


Comprehensive investigations are required preoperatively to determine the epileptogenic zone accurately. It is still difficult to determine epileptogenic zones for patients whose lesions cannot be detected with MRI or discordant imaging results using imaging methods. In this study, the zone determined using distinct types of scalp EEG ictal patterns was confirmed by comparisons between ESL and the resected area.

Methods based on solution of the inverse problem are used to obtain a physiologically meaningful source image although a unique solution is not possible to reach especially when physio-anatomical restrictions or boundary conditions are not very tight. [41] The reason why we chose LORETA among other available methods that use inverse solutions was that low-resolution methods can successfully estimate primary active zone though with a weak spatial resolution. [13],[15],[42],[43] This method is a useful tool to reconstruct basic source configurations, but not huge amount of unconstricted sources in a determined region. [41] In addition, time independency is one of the most important characteristics of LORETA, so that localization of a combination of sources could be performed by just one time sample. Furthermore, no pre-assumption about the number of sources is needed in LORETA method. In the present study, confirmation was achieved by assessing the extent of overlap between the zone obtained by using LORETA and the area resected during surgery. Outcome of the surgery was also considered.

ESL was implemented on nine patients with lesions and six patients without lesions on their MRI. All of them had follow-up for at least one year. ESL results obtained using the patients' preoperative scalp-EEG data and postoperative MR images showed concordance with the resected brain region for 13 patients who were postoperatively seizure-free. In the remaining two patients, ESL identified a zone adjacent to the resected area, and this was interpreted as indicating that the epileptogenic zone had not been resected completely, as suggested by. [29] Those two patients did have seizures, though fewer, after their operations, supporting this interpretation. The current study supports a previous study which identified the epileptogenic zone accurately in eight of 10 patients with normal MRIs using ESL with the distributed source model, local autoregressive average (LAURA) method. [29] The main reason why a 88% accuracy rate could be achieved by ESL may be the utilization of each patient's individual digital MR images, and this is consistent with the results reported by Brodbeck and colleagues (2011). [30]

In our study, we were able to achieve an accurate ESL with LORETA for 13 of the 15 patients studied. The scalp ictal EEG of the remaining two patients (Patients 4 and 13) displayed ictal spiking and rhythmic activity. Ictal EEG records play a significant role for practical applications related with clinical matters like seizure propensity, seizure control, and drug-related neurotoxicity. Our findings support the results of Clemens and colleagues' study (2010), [44] which demonstrated that LORETA should be a beneficial tool for research on the matters mentioned above. This fact is supported by the insufficiency of other neuroimaging methods (magnetic resonance imaging methods, positron emission tomography) on this sort of problems. [44] The resected brain area was correctly assigned in our study using LORETA for one postoperatively seizure-free patient whose scalp ictal EEG activity consisted of obscured activity. From this view point, our attempt seems to be a relatively successful one when compared with the study of Koessler and colleagues (2010), [19] who performed ESL using scalp EEG ictal data for nine patients (two of them with normal MRIs) with LORETA and assessed the accuracy of their ESL results by examining the determined epileptogenic zone using intracranial EEG recordings. Although they were able to identify the epileptogenic zone accurately for seven patients with abnormal MRI and determined accurately the area causing the seizures for one of the two patients with normal MRIs, they failed to do the same thing for the other patient whose scalp EEG ictal activity had consisted of obscured activity.

An area overlapping with but somewhat wider than the resected region was estimated to be epileptogenic using the ESL data obtained from LORETA for six patients. In three of these patients, it was observed that the scalp EEG was composed of spike activity. Of these three patients, two had rhythmic activity, and one had obscured activity in their scalp EEG. This can be interpreted as that the determined wide area is resulting from each possible current source localization that arises from the measured EEG's topographic representation on the surface of the scalp, as reported by. [45] In addition, it is suggested that distributed models are not sufficient to determine the epileptogenic zone when they are used alone, but they can provide valuable knowledge, especially in cases in which information regarding seizure propagation is needed. LORETA source model are more proficient in localization of widespread regions compared to localizing limited areas.

Michel et al. (2004a, b) [8],[9] points out that using MRI scans of individuals is beneficial in determination of an epileptogenic zone with a single dominant focus, which was the case for our patients. Therefore, one reason why in our study the epileptogenic zone determined by using LORETA is concordant with the resected area for postoperatively seizure-free patients, may be because their individual MR data were used to construct the head model. From this point of view, our results are in line with those of [30] who used the patients' own MRI to construct the head model for ESL and reported their localization precision with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 88%.

In this study, histopathology of resected tissue from the patients revealed FCD and hippocampal sclerosis. An accurate ESL could be achieved by using LORETA despite these disparate histopathological results, suggesting that successful ESL is possible even in cases no histopathological information is available.

Significance of the study

Based on verification using postoperative MR images of patients, it is demonstrated in this ESL study that accurate estimation of epileptogenic region is possible by employing the LORETA method. Our results suggest that the information obtained by means of LORETA can be used in planning surgery according to the type of epilepsy and its most likely sites in the individual patient. For clinicians who are in need of noninvasive methods based on advanced quantitative EEG that can accurately identify and localize the epileptogenic zone in higher number of candidates for surgery, the results of the present study are promising.

Acknowledgments

I am thankful to my thesis advisor Professor Çiğdem Özkara, my co-supervisor Professor Mustafa Uzan and Professor Pekcan Ungan for providing extensive comments and discussions in every phase of this study. The present work was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University. Project No: 19321 and also TC, Science, Industry and Technology Ministry. Project No: 727. TGSD.2011.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Plummer C, Harvey AS, Cook M. EEG source localization in focal epilepsy: Where are we now? Epilepsia 2008;49:201-18.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Makeig S, Debener S, Onton J, Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn Sci 2004;8:204-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brazier MA. A study of the electric field at the surface of the head. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1949;2:38-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Shaw JC, Roth M. Potential distribution analysis II: A theoretical consideration of its significance in terms of electrical field theory. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1955;7:285-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Kaiboriboon K, Lüders HO, Hamaneh M, Turnbull J, Lhatoo SD. EEG source imaging in epilepsy - Practicalities and pitfalls. Nat Rev Neurol 2012;8:498-507.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ebersole JS. Noninvasive localization of epileptogenic foci by EEG source modeling. Epilepsia 2000;41:S24-33.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lantz G, Grave de Peralta R, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: How many electrodes are needed? Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:63-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Michel CM, Murray MM, Lantz G, Gonzalez S, Spinelli L, Grave de Pelta R. EEG Source imaging. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2195-222.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Michel C, Lantz G, Spinelli L, De Peralta GR, Landis T, Seeck M. 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: Clinical yield and localization precision. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004;21:71-83.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gavaret M, Badier JM, Marquis P, Bartolomei F, Chauvel P. Electric source imaging in temporal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004;21:267-82.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gavaret M, Badier JM, Marquis P, McGonigal A, Bartolomei F, Regis J, et al. Electric source imaging in frontal lobe epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:358-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gavaret M, Trébuchon A, Bartolomei F, Marquis P, McGonigal A, Wendling F, et al. Source localization of scalp-EEG interictal spikes in posterior cortex epilepsies investigated by HR-EEG and SEEG. Epilepsia 2009;50:276-89.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lantz G, Michel CM, Seeck M, Blanke O, Spinelli L, Thut G, et al. Space-oriented segmentation and 3-dimensional source reconstruction of ictal EEG patterns. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:688-97.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Boon P, D'Havé M, Vanrumste B, Van Hoey G, Vonck K, Van Walleghem P, et al. Ictal source localization in presurgical patients with refractory epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2002;19:461-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Holmes MD, Brown M, Tucker DM. Are "generalized" seizures truly generalized? Evidence of localized mesial frontal and frontopolar discharges in absence. Epilepsia 2004;45:1568-79.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Beniczky S, Oturai PS, Alving J, Sabers A, Herning M, Fabricius M. Source analysis of epileptic discharges using multiple signal classification analysis. Neuroreport 2006;17:1283-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ding L, Worrell GA, Lagerlund TD, He B. Ictal source analysis: Localization and imaging of causal interactions in humans. Neuroimage 2007;34:575-86.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Foldvary N, Klem G, Hammel J, Bingaman W, Najm I, Luders H. The localizing value of ictal EEG in focal epilepsy. Neurology 2001;57:2022-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Koessler L, Benar C, Maillard L, Badier JM, Vignal JP, Bartolomei F, et al. Source localization of ictal epileptic activity investigated by high resolution EEG and validated by SEEG. Neuroimage 2010;51:642-53.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Meijs JW, Bosch FG, Peters MJ, Lopes da Silva FH. On the magnetic field distribution generated by a dipolar current source situated in a realistically shaped compartment model of the head. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987;66:286-98.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Hamalainen M, Sarvas J. Realistic conductor geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989;36:165-71.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Cuffin BN. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37:44-52.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Cuffin BN. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993;40:42-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Cuffin BN. EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1996;43:299-303.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Thevenet M, Bertrand O, Perrin F, Dumont T, Pernier J. The finite element method for the realistic head model of electrical brain activities: Preliminary results. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1991;12:89-94.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Roth BJ, Balish M, Gorbach A, Sato S. How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;87:175-84.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Menninghaus E, Lutkenhoner B, Gonzales SL. Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: Realistic versus spherical model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994;41:986-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Gençer NG, Tanzer IO, Özdemir MK, Acar CE, Sungur M. State of art in realistic head modeling for electro-magnetic source imaging of the human brain. Elektrik 1998;6:167-82.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Pollo C, Schaller K, Vargas M, et al. Electrical source imaging for presurgical focus localization in epilepsy patients with normal MRI. Epilepsia 2010;51:583-91.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Brodbeck V, Spinelli L, Lascano AM, Wissmeier M, Vargas MI, Vulliemoz S, et al. Electroencephalographic source imaging: A prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients. Brain 2011;134:2887-97.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Sperli F, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Kurian M, Michel CM, Lantz G. EEG source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: A new perspective in presurgical workup. Epilepsia 2006;47:981-90.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Leijten FS, Huiskamp G. Interictal electromagnetic source imaging in focal epilepsy: Practices, results and recommendations. Curr Opin Neurol 2008;21:437-45.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Brodbeck V, Lascano AM, Spinelli L, Seeck M, Michel CM. Accuracy of EEG source imaging of epileptic spikes in patients with large brain lesions. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:679-85.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Blume WT, Ganapathy GR, Munoz D, Lee DH. Indices of resective surgery effectiveness for intractable nonlesional focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2004;45:46-53.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 1994;18:49-65.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Fuchs M, Wagner M, Kohler T, Wischmann HA. Linear and nonlinear current density reconstructions. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999;16:267-95.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
de Peralta Menendez RG, Andino SL. Discussing the capabilities of Laplacian minimization. Brain Topogr 2000;13:97-104.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Aubert-Vazquez E, Valdes-Sosa PA. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging. Neuroimage 2004;21:1300-19.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Koessler L, Maillard L, Benhadid A, Vignal JP, Braun M, Vespignani H. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;37:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Pascual-Marqui RD, Esslen M, Kochi K, Lehmann D. Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): A review. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002;24:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Liu H, Schimpf PH, Dong G, Gao X, Yang F, Gao S. Standardized shrinking LORETA-FOCUSS (SSLOFO): A new algorithm for spatio-temporal EEG source reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1681-91.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Worrell GA, Lagerlund TD, Sharbrough FW, Brinkmann BH, Busacker NE, Cicora KM, et al. Localization of the epileptic focus by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography in patients with a lesion demonstrated by MRI. Brain Topogr 2000;12:273-82.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Zumsteg D, Friedman A, Weiser HG, Wennberg RA. Source localization of interictal epileptiform discharges: Comparison of three different techniques to improve signal to noise ratio. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:562-71.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Clemens B, Bessenyei M, Fekete I, Puskás S, Kondákor I, Tóth M, et al. Theta EEG source localization using LORETA in partial epilepsy patients with and without medication. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:848-58.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Pascual-Marqui RD. Discrete, 3D distributed, linear imaging methods of electric neuronal activity. Part 1: Exact, zero error localization 2007;arXiv:0710.3341.  Back to cited text no. 45
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (584 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1919    
    Printed46    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded74    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal