Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 634 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size
VIEW POINT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 373-376

Critical appraisal of guidelines for evaluation and certification of specified neurological disabilities


1 Department of Neurology, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
3 Department of Psychiatry, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
4 School of Public Health, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Inder Puri
Department of Neurology, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_165_19

Rights and Permissions

New disability law called “Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016” has been acted in 2016. The United Nations' Convention for Rights of Persons with Disabilities is the sole of this new act. Of the total 21 categories, three new neurological legal disability categories such as chronic neurological conditions, Parkinson disease (PD), and multiple sclerosis have been notified first time in the new act. The new guidelines have been notified in the year 2018 for evaluation and certification of specified disabilities. As a new addition in these guidelines, modified Rankin scale score has been added to measure locomotor disability of stroke. Certainly, newer guidelines have many lacunae also. There are no recommendations of any method of disability measurement associated with movement disorders such as PD, chronic neurological conditions such as migraine, epilepsy, and ataxia. The tables of older guidelines for disability calculation in conditions such as unconsciousness and epileptic fits have been removed in newer guidelines. Professional bodies should come into action immediately and do effort for rectifying these shortcomings and/or fallacies in new guidelines.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed370    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal