brintellex
ValprolBanner
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 2466 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size

Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 265-269
 

Comparison of risk factors, treatment, and outcome in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease in India and the United States


1 Comprehensive Stroke Care Program, Department of Neurology, Sree ChitraTirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
2 Department of Neurology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences, Chicago, US
3 Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree ChitraTirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Date of Submission27-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance18-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication05-Jun-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. P N Sylaja
Professor of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Care Program, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum - 695 011, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_549_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Background and Aims: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is common in the Asian population, but less studied in South Asians compared to East Asians. We compared risk factors, treatments, and outcomes among consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAD from India with a mixed-ethnic cohort from Chicago, Illinois. Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAD were enrolled at 2 academic medical centers in Kerala, India and Chicago, United States. Data on demographics, risk factors, initial stroke severity (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score [NIHSS]), recurrent stroke, and 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) were prospectively collected. Recurrent stroke was defined as symptomatic recurrence of focal neurologic deficits associated with radiographic evidence of new cerebral infarction within 3 months of index admission. Results: 329 patients (117 from Kerala, 212 from Chicago) were included. Indian patients were younger (61 vs. 68, P < 0.001), less frequently had prior stroke history (15.4 vs. 32.5%, P = 0.001) and coronary artery disease (11.1 vs. 22.2%, P = 0.013) but had higher initial NIHSS score (median 6 vs. 3, P < 0.001). Both groups received reperfusion therapy in similar proportions (8.5 vs. 7.1%, P = 0.630) but at discharge, 90.6% of Indian patients compared to 59.0% of Chicago patients were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. More recurrent strokes occurred in Chicago patients (21.7 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001) but functional outcome did not differ significantly. Conclusion: Compared to patients in US with symptomatic ICAD, Indian patients were younger and had more severe strokes. However, Indian patients had lower rates of recurrent stroke, perhaps due to greater use of dual antiplatelet therapy.


Keywords: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease, outcome, risk factors, recurrence


How to cite this article:
Saraf U, Prabhakaran S, Arun K, Babiker A, Rajendran A, Kesavadas C, Sylaja P N. Comparison of risk factors, treatment, and outcome in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease in India and the United States. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020;23:265-9

How to cite this URL:
Saraf U, Prabhakaran S, Arun K, Babiker A, Rajendran A, Kesavadas C, Sylaja P N. Comparison of risk factors, treatment, and outcome in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease in India and the United States. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 3];23:265-9. Available from: http://www.annalsofian.org/text.asp?2020/23/3/265/286079





   Introduction Top


In Asians, studies suggest a high prevalence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), with rates up to 33% to 50% in ethnic South Asians,[1],[2],[3] making ICAD the most common cause of stroke worldwide.[4],[5] Patients with symptomatic ICAD have elevated risk of recurrent stroke of 12% in the first one year despite best medical therapy,[6] and as high as 38% in some cohort studies.[7] This risk is non-linear with approximately half of the risk occurring in the first month.[8],[9],[10] Studies from Asia[9] have reported lower risk of recurrent stroke as compared to Western population. Small studies from India[11],[12] have reported similar patterns of recurrent stroke risks in patients with ICAD. However, detailed imaging analysis, quality of stroke care, and outcomes are scarce in South Asians cohorts with ICAD. Furthermore, whether South Asians with symptomatic ICAD fare differently compared to the Western patients with ICAD is unknown. Our aim was to compare risk factors, presentation, severity, treatment, and outcomes in patients with symptomatic ICAD from Kerala, India with a cohort from Chicago, United States (US).


   Methods Top


Study population

Consecutive patients over 18 years of age with symptomatic ICAD defined by ≥50% stenosis or occlusion were enrolled between 2012 and 2017 at two academic centers: Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India and Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, IL, United States. The local institutional ethics boards approved the study at each site.

Patients with confirmed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in the territory distal to a stenosis or occluded intracranial artery involving any of the following arteries were included: intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), proximal (M1 or M2) middle cerebral artery (MCA), proximal (P1) posterior cerebral artery (PCA), proximal (A1) anterior cerebral artery (ACA) intracranial (V4) vertebral artery (VA), and basilar artery (BA). Stenosis of the vessel was determined using modified WASID method on CTA, or DSA when available, with moderate stenosis defined at 50-69% stenosis and severe stenosis or occlusion defined as ≥70% stenosis. Among those with only MRA performed, we measured degree of stenosis as ≥50% by the modified WASID method and further categorized stenosis as 50-69% when flow gap was not present and ≥70 stenosis when flow gap was present.[6],[13] Symptomatic ICAD required that the infarct on DWI or CT (for AIS) or the referable symptoms (for TIA) were localized to the vascular distribution of the stenotic artery without another causative mechanism found on diagnostic testing.

Baseline data collection

We prospectively collected data on demographics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity), initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score during index hospitalization, risk factors, hospital course, and treatments were collected. Baseline brain and vascular imaging was independently reviewed for presence of acute infarcts on DWI or CT along with location, degree of stenosis, and vascular territory, blinded to outcome data. We also collected data on provision of acute reperfusion therapy defined as intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatments in eligible patients presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset.

Medical treatments at discharge

We collected data on medications at discharge including antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, extended release dipyridamole plus aspirin), anticoagulants (warfarin and non-vitamin K antagonists), statin therapy, antihypertensive medication, and anti-diabetic medications (e. g., oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin).

Outcomes at 3 months: Using a standardized questionnaire administered by trained research staff, patients or proxies were contacted to determine events after hospital discharge. Recurrent AIS in the territory of the symptomatic artery within 90 days of index event was the primary outcome. The functional outcome at 90 days was recorded using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).[14] Poor outcome was defined as mRS > 2.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as number (percent), mean (standard deviation [SD]), or median (interquartile range [IQR]) as appropriate. Baseline, treatment, and outcome data were compared between the US and Indian cohorts using Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant in univariate comparisons. All analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY).


   Results Top


Three-hundred twenty-nine patients (117 from India, 212 from US) were included.

CT angiography was the best imaging modality for diagnosis of ICAD in 67%, MR angiography in 25%, and DSA in 8% of patients.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics

All the clinical and demographic characteristics are given in [Table 1]. Indian patients were younger (61 vs. 68 years, P < 0.001), less frequently had prior stroke history (15.4% vs. 32.5%, P = 0.001), and coronary artery disease (11.1 vs. 22.2%, P = 0.013), but more frequently had diabetes mellitus (64.9% vs 51.9%, P = 0.027). Indian patients had higher initial NIHSS (median 6 vs. 3, P < 0.001). Though smoking was similar between groups, smoking was more common in Indian males (38.9% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.007).
Table 1: Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcome of patients

Click here to view


Indian patients with diabetes had more severe stroke compared to non-diabetics (median NIHSS 7 vs 4, P = 0.009). For US patients, age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, prior history of stroke, CAD, or smoking did not affect stroke severity significantly. Patients on antiplatelets prior to stroke had milder strokes (median NIHSS 3 vs 4.5, P = 0.014).

Both groups received reperfusion therapy in similar proportions (8.5% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.630). At discharge, 90.6% of Indian patients compared to 59.0% of Chicago patients were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (P < 0.001). Indian patients were also more likely to be discharged on statin therapy (100% vs. 92.5%; P < 0.002).

Follow-up data

More recurrent strokes occurred in US patients (21.7% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.001), though functional outcome did not differ significantly. Of the 46 patients in the US cohort with recurrent strokes, 25 (54.3%) were black, 16 (34.7%) were white and 5 (11%) were other (Hispanic/mixed). Indian patients were more likely to have recurrent TIA as compared to US patients (6.8% vs 1.9%, P = 0.03). Patients with ≥70% stenosis were more likely to have poor functional outcomes at 3 months (35.8% vs. 20%, P = 0.009). The 3 month functional outcome significantly correlated with initial stroke severity (r = 0.568, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, initial stroke severity (OR 8.94, CI 5.01-15.94, P < 0.001) and degree of stenosis (OR 2.00, CI 0.99-4.05, P = 0.053) were independent predictors of poor functional outcome at 90 days [Table 2]. No predictor of recurrent stroke/TIA was identified [Table 3].
Table 2: Multivariable logistic regression models of poor functional outcome at 3 months

Click here to view
Table 3: Multivariable logistic regression models of recurrent stroke/TIA at 3 months

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Comprising 25% of the world's population, South Asians are a rapidly growing ethnic group with unique genetic, biologic, and environmental risk factors.[15] Stroke mortality among Indians is higher compared to Whites in developed countries.[16],[17] The greater burden and severity of vascular risk factors among South Asians likely accounts for the greater incidence and severity of vascular events. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that South Asians experience stroke at younger ages.[3],[18] The Indo-US Stroke project[19] found Indian patients to be younger and have differing risk factor profile. Although genetics are believed to contribute to the elevated risk of stroke among South Asians, there are also regional variations that are likely influenced by geographic characteristics, diet, availability of medical care and socioeconomic status. Although Asians experience more severe strokes, they are less likely to have recurrent strokes. In a large cohort from China,[9] recurrent stroke risk was 6% at 1 year follow-up, which was considerably lower than the Western population.

Several studies have shown a strong association between diabetes and stroke in South Asians. The South Asians, especially males, are at a disproportionately higher risk of developing diabetes and at a younger age due to biological and lifestyle factors compared to other ethnic groups.[20] This increased prevalence of diabetes has been associated with increase in incident stroke, stroke recurrence, and stroke mortality.[21],[22],[23],[24] South Asians have been observed to have a significantly higher prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes than other US ethnic groups (Chinese Americans, Whites, African Americans, Latinos).[20]

Exposure to atherosclerotic risk factors such as diabetes and smoking may explain some of our findings. Prior studies have documented that diabetes is strongly associated with ICAD in a mixed ethnic cohort in the US.[25] Greater prevalence of diabetes among South Asians may be a major determinant of ICAD in this population and may also contribute to our finding of earlier onset of disease and greater stroke severity in Indian population.[26] Secondly, smokers develop stroke at a younger age as compared to non-smokers.[27] In a cohort of patients with ICAD from Korea,[28] smokers were more likely to have stroke at a younger age, specifically < 70 years of age. Higher prevalence of smoking in Indian males may further contribute to younger age of Indian patients. Finally, patients on antiplatelets prior to stroke have been reported to have reduced stroke severity, especially for large artery atherosclerotic etiology.[26] The US patients were more likely to be on antiplatelets prior to current stroke, which may also have contributed to reduced stroke severity in them.

Despite greater severity and younger age at time of index stroke, Indian patients had significantly fewer recurrent strokes as compared to the cohort from US. Dual antiplatelet therapy was more commonly prescribed in the Indian cohort for 3 months after stroke, which may reduce recurrent stroke risk as found in the medical management arm of the SAMMPRIS trial.[6] However, in study by Sangha et al.,[29] ICAD patients on dual antiplatelets had same risk of recurrence as patients not on dual antiplatelets. Although Indian patients had fewer recurrent strokes, they had more TIAs at 3 months. This may be explained by the reduced severity of recurrent strokes, as they were more commonly on dual antiplatelets.[26] Control of risk factors, which was a part of aggressive medical management in SAMMPRIS trial, is an important factor which reduces the stroke recurrence in ICAD, but meticulous information of risk factor control was not available from our patients. Detailed analysis of imaging data including involvement of other intracranial vessels and presence of collaterals, may also help in assessing risk of recurrence.

Initial stroke severity has been reported to be a significant predictor of 3-month functional outcome.[30] Indian patients had more severe strokes at onset and more functional disability at 3 months. Even after adjusting for age and risk factors, initial stroke severity was the most significant predictor for poor functional outcome in our study.

Severity of stenosis has been reported as risk factor for recurrent events.[13] However, its contribution to functional outcome has not been reported previously. We found that severity of stenosis was a significant predictor for poor functional outcome.

Strengths of the study

Our study relied on stroke neurologist and neuroradiologist adjudicated diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerosis based on high-quality imaging - CT angiography or MR angiography in all the cases. All patients were extensively evaluated to rule out alternative etiologies for stroke. Although it was a retrospective study, parameters like recurrent events, functional status were evaluated and regularly documented by experienced neurologists at scheduled follow-ups, giving comprehensive and reliable data.

Limitations

Risk factor control, an important factor which predicts stroke recurrence, was not available from our study. Recurrent TIA was a clinical diagnosis and imaging data was not available for all patients. The Indian patients were a homogenous sample but patients from the US consisted of multiethnic group and hence may not be homogenous. Since many of the milder strokes may not have visited the hospitals in India, the baseline increased stroke severity of Indian patients may be a sampling bias in the study.


   Conclusion Top


We observed that symptomatic ICAD in India is associated with greater stroke severity and younger age at index presentation. Despite this, the treatment with dual antiplatelets may have reduced the stroke recurrence in Indian patients.

Acknowledgements

Nil.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Khan M, Rasheed A, Hashmi S, Zaidi M, Murtaza M, Akhtar S, et al. Stroke radiology and distinguishing characteristics of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in native South Asian Pakistanis. Int J Stroke 2013;8(Suppl A100):14-20.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
De Silva DA, Woon FP, Pin LM, Chen CP, Chang HM, Wong MC. Intracranial large artery disease among OCSP subtypes in ethnic South Asian ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol Sci 2007;260:147-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Khan NA, Quan H, Hill MD, Pilote L, McAlister FA, Palepu A, et al. Risk factors, quality of care and prognosis in South Asian, East Asian and white patients with stroke. BMC Neurol 2013;13:74.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gorelick PB, Wong KS, Bae HJ, Pandey DK. Large artery intracranial occlusive disease: A large worldwide burden but a relatively neglected frontier. Stroke 2008;39:2396-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wong LK. Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke 2006;1:158-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, Turan TN, Fiorella D, Lane BF, et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993-1003.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mazighi M, Tanasescu R, Ducrocq X, Vicaut E, Bracard S, Houdart E, et al. Prospective study of symptomatic atherothrombotic intracranial stenoses: The GESICA study. Neurology 2006;66:1187-91.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Komotar RJ, Kellner CP, Raper DM, Strozyk D, Higashida RT, Meyers PM. Update on the natural history of intracranial atherosclerotic disease: A critical review. World J Radiol 2010;2:166-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Soo YO, Pu Y, Pan Y, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: The chinese intracranial atherosclerosis (CICAS) study. Stroke 2014;45:663-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Khan M, Naqvi I, Bansari A, Kamal AK. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke Res Treat 2011;2011:282845.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kate M, Sylaja PN, Kesavadas C, Thomas B. Imaging and clinical predictors of unfavorable outcome in medically treated symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:973-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ram R, Kaul S, Alladi S, Afshan JS, Prabha TS, Kohat A, et al. Risk factors, vascular lesion distribution, outcome and recurrence of strokes due to intracranial atherosclerosis: One year data from hyderabad stroke registry. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2017;20:387-92.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
13.
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305-16.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Bruno A, Akinwuntan AE, Lin C, Close B, Davis K, Baute V, et al. Simplified modified rankin scale questionnaire: Reproducibility over the telephone and validation with quality of life. Stroke 2011;42:2276-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hussain SM, Oldenburg B, Wang Y, Zoungas S, Tonkin AM. Assessment of cardiovascular disease risk in South Asian populations. Int J Vasc Med 2013;2013:786801.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Gholap N, Davies M, Patel K, Sattar N, Khunti K. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in South Asians. Prim Care Diabetes 2011;5:45-56.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gunarathne A, Patel JV, Gammon B, Gill PS, Hughes EA, Lip GY. Ischemic stroke in South Asians: A review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and ethnicity-related clinical features. Stroke 2009;40:e415-23.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hsu RT, Ardron ME, Brooks W, Cherry D, Taub NA, Botha JL. The 1996 leicestershire community stroke and ethnicity study: Differences and similarities between South Asian and white strokes. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:853-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sylaja PN, Pandian JD, Kaul S, Srivastava MVP, Khurana D, Schwamm LH, et al. Ischemic stroke profile, risk factors, and outcomes in India: The Indo-US collaborative stroke project. Stroke 2018;49:219-22.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kanaya AM, Herrington D, Vittinghoff E, Ewing SK, Liu K, Blaha MJ, et al. Understanding the high prevalence of diabetes in U. S. south Asians compared with four racial/ethnic groups: The MASALA and MESA studies. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1621-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Sen S, Dahlberg K, Case A, Paolini S, Burdine J, Peddareddygari LR, et al. Racial-ethnic differences in stroke risk factors and subtypes: Results of a prospective hospital-based registry. Int J Neurosci 2013;123:568-74.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Gezmu T, Schneider D, Demissie K, Lin Y, Gizzi MS. Risk factors for acute stroke among South Asians compared to other racial/ethnic groups. PLoS One 2014;9:e108901.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Dhamoon MS, Zhou L, Stamplecoski M, Kapral M, Shah B. Stroke recurrence among South Asians with diabetes in Ontario, Canada. Int J Stroke 2016;11:890-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Gunarathne A, Patel JV, Potluri R, Gammon B, Jessani S, Hughes EA, et al. Increased 5-year mortality in the migrant South Asian stroke patients with diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom: The West Birmingham stroke project. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:197-201.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Rincon F, Sacco RL, Kranwinkel G, Xu Q, Paik MC, Boden-Albala B, et al. Incidence and risk factors of intracranial atherosclerotic stroke: The Northern Manhattan stroke study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:65-71.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kim WJ, Ko Y, Yang MH, Im SH, Park JH, Lee J, et al. Differential effect of previous antiplatelet use on stroke severity according to stroke mechanism. Stroke 2010;41:1200-4.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ji R, Pan Y, Yan H, Zhang R, Liu G, Wang P, et al. Current smoking is associated with extracranial carotid atherosclerotic stenosis but not with intracranial large artery disease. BMC Neurol 2017;17:120.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Kim DE, Lee KB, Jang IM, Roh H, Ahn MY, Lee J. Associations of cigarette smoking with intracranial atherosclerosis in the patients with acute ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:1243-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Sangha RS, Naidech AM, Corado C, Ansari SA, Prabhakaran S. Challenges in the medical management of symptomatic intracranial stenosis in an urban setting. Stroke 2017;48:2158-63.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Bhaskar S, Stanwell P, Bivard A, Spratt N, Walker R, Kitsos GH, et al. The influence of initial stroke severity on mortality, overall functional outcome and in-hospital placement at 90 days following acute ischemic stroke: A tertiary hospital stroke register study. Neurol India 2017;65:1252-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (336 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
     Introduction
     Methods
     Results
     Discussion
     Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed110    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded26    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal