Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
  Users Online: 2563 Home | About the Journal | InstructionsCurrent Issue | Back IssuesLogin      Print this page Email this page  Small font size Default font size Increase font size

Table of Contents
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 35-41

Multidetector computed tomography angiography: Application in vertebral artery dissection

1 Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom
2 Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF, United Kingdom

Date of Submission20-Aug-2010
Date of Decision12-Oct-2010
Date of Acceptance29-Dec-2010
Date of Web Publication15-Mar-2011

Correspondence Address:
Evelyn Teasdale
Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow G51 4TF
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0972-2327.78048

Rights and Permissions



Background and Purpose: Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) is a minimally invasive radiological technique providing high-resolution images of the arterial wall and angiographic images of the lumen. We studied the radiological features of vertebral artery dissection (VAD) in a consecutive series of patients investigated for acute stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in order to confirm and define the diagnostic features of VAD on MDCTA. Patients and Methods: Review of patients identified prospectively over a 4-year period with VAD assessed by MDCTA was conducted. Radiological features of VAD on MDCTA were reanalyzed utilising previously reported criteria for VAD. Results: Thirty-five patients (25 males, mean age 49.6 years) with a total of 45 dissected vertebral arteries were reviewed. MDCTA features of VAD included increased wall thickness in 44/45 (97.7%) arteries and increased total vessel diameter in 42/45 arteries (93.3%). All dissected arteries had either lumen stenosis (21/45) or associated segmental occlusion (24/45). An intimal flap was detected in 6/45 (13.3 %) vessels. Twenty-five patients had follow-up imaging, 14/32 vessels returned to normal, 4 showed improvement in stenosis but did not return to normal and 14 demonstrated no change. The majority of non-occluded vessels became normal or displayed improved patency. Only 4/17 occluded arteries demonstrated re-establishment of flow. No adverse effects were recorded. Conclusions: MDCTA is a safe and reliable technique for the diagnosis of VAD. Increased wall thickness (97.7%) and increased vessel wall diameter (93.3%) were the most frequently observed features.

Keywords: Multidetector computed tomographic angiography, vertebral artery dissection, stroke, sub-arachnoid hemorrhage

How to cite this article:
Teasdale E, Zampakis P, Santosh C, Razvi S. Multidetector computed tomography angiography: Application in vertebral artery dissection. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2011;14:35-41

How to cite this URL:
Teasdale E, Zampakis P, Santosh C, Razvi S. Multidetector computed tomography angiography: Application in vertebral artery dissection. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2022 Sep 25];14:35-41. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Vertebral artery dissection (VAD), spontaneous or traumatic, is increasingly recognized as a cause of stroke, especially in younger patients. [1],[2],[3] Anticoagulation is often utilized for stenotic/occlusive VAD to prevent secondary thromboembolism. [4] Prompt diagnosis of dissection is important because subsequent stroke may be delayed, and therefore potentially avoided, by early intervention. [5] Stenting over the dissection is an alternative, but as yet, unproven treatment. [6],[7],[8]

Digital subtraction catheter angiography (DSA) has been used as the standard technique for VAD diagnosis. However, DSA does not demonstrate vessel wall pathology. [9],[10] Diagnosis through DSA, therefore, depends on features found in only 10% of patients (intimal flap, double lumen or dissecting aneurysm) and in most patients is inferred only from indirect features of VAD (irregular stenosis, occlusion or aneurysmal dilatation). Due to DSA's limitations, non-invasive techniques that visualize the vessel wall, such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography (MDCTA), are increasingly utilized. [11],[12],[1]3,[1]4,[15],[16] In contrast to DSA, MDCTA is widely available and is easily performed after an initial axial CT scan.

Our center has used MDCTA as the first-line radiological tool for arterial assessment in patients presenting with acute stroke and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) since the year 2000. We have applied MDCTA criteria for VAD similar to those initially described by Kurokawa et al. and subsequently by Chen et al. [11],[13]

In this paper, we review patients with VAD studied by MDCTA over a 4-year period, including both spontaneous and traumatic VAD.

   Patients and Methods Top

Patients in the 4-year study period included the following.

  1. Patients with VAD diagnosed on MDCTA and added prospectively to a database for VAD.
  2. Patients with VAD diagnosed on review of all radiological requests and review of all scan results of all patients with stroke assessed by MDCTA in the 4-year study period.
  3. Patients with suspected but not proven VAD from prior imaging with MR/MRA who had VAD confirmed on MDCTA.
  4. Patients with SAH and VAD identified on MDCTA. All such patients had subsequent DSA as a prelude to intravascular treatment or to exclude a missed aneurysmal cause. DSA confirmed MDCTA diagnosis in all these patients.

Our cohort, therefore, included all patients with MDCTA evidence of spontaneous or traumatic VAD in the study period (January 2003-January 2006).

Our radiological observations were reviewed and re-analyzed on the basis of MDCTA criteria for VAD described in two previous series. [13],[16]

Clinical features were reviewed retrospectively from case records.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography technique

Patients were scanned with a quad multidetector helical CT scanner (Philips MX8000, Royal Philips Electronics, the Netherlands). Two MDCTA techniques were employed during the period reviewed. In acute stroke patients who were confused and unable to cooperate, a limited scan from the level of the sixth cervical vertebra to the Circle of Willis was performed. Twenty-one patients were examined in this manner using a 1 mm helix [field of vision (FOV) 180 mm, 0.5 second per rotation, 1.3 mm slice thickness, 0.6 mm table increment (pitch 0.875), 120 kV and 210 mA, 18 second delay from start of injection to start of scan]. A similar protocol was used for those with SAH, but this commenced at the level of the second cervical vertebra. The remaining 14 stroke patients were able to cooperate fully with breathing instructions and so had a complete examination from the aortic arch to the Circle of Willis using a 2.5 mm helix (pitch 0.8, 0.5 second rotation, scan triggered when the contrast density was 150 Hounsfield Units in the ascending aorta). In all patients, 100 ml of non-ionic low-osmolar contrast media [Iobitridol 350 mg L/ml (Xenetix® , Laboratoire Guerbet)] was administered via a cubital vein at a rate of 4 ml/second. Patients spent about 20 minutes in the radiology department although the scan acquisition was over in under 30 seconds. Reconstructed images were processed on Philips workstation (MX VIEW). An assessment of the vessels from the axial base data was most relevant with use made of maximum intensity projections (MIP), multiplanar reformations (MPR) and volume rendered three-dimensional (3D) images. These were the same standard post-processing techniques used by the radiologist in the original diagnostic image assessment and were completed within 10-15 minutes.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography image assessment

All patients had originally been diagnosed as having VAD on the basis of our center's imaging criteria for VAD on MDCTA. All MDCTA studies were re-assessed by consensus review by two neuroradiologists (CS and ET) experienced in assessing CT angiographic examinations. MDCTA of individual vertebral arteries was analyzed using the standard four anatomical segmentation of the vertebral artery [Figure 1].
Figure 1: A 6-mm coronal slab maximum intensity projection CT angiogram. The four divisions of the vertebral artery are illustrated. The maximum diameter of the left vertebral artery is measured as 4.1 mm. There is dissection of the V3 segment between the arrows with aneurysm formation at the origin of the dissection and irregular stenosis of the lumen which becomes normal as the artery pierces the dura

Click here to view

We analyzed the vertebral arteries for the following features:

  • Wall thickness and total vessel diameter (comparison with a non-affected segment on the ipsilateral or contralateral artery, taking into account the recognized anatomical differences in size of the vertebral arteries) [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]
  • Segmental luminal stenosis [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]
  • Figure 2: This is an axial 2-mm MIP at the level of C1 of the same patient as in Figure 1. On the left, the total vessel diameter is 6.1 mm which reduces to the normal 4.2 mm diameter just at the dural margin. The shoulder where the dissection ends lies at the level of the arrow. On the right, the total vessel diameter is again increased, the wall of the vessel thickened at 2.9 mm and the vessel occludes at the level of the dura

    Click here to view
  • Vessel occlusion combined with 1 above (in accordance with the published data and our own observations, vessel occlusion without increased total vessel diameter was diagnosed as embolic occlusion and so excluded from the study group) [Figure 3]
  • Figure 3: Axial 2 mm MIP at the level of C1.The left vertebral artery is normal. No wall can be identified as is the usual situation. On the right, there is irregular tapered occlusion of the V3 dissected segment. There is also evidence of vessel wall thickening

    Click here to view
  • Intimal flap [Figure 4]
  • Figure 4: Axial 2 mm MIP at the level of C4. The left vertebral artery is normal. The right shows a lumen compressed on either side by low attenuation filling defect. This is a dissection flap and as the images are scrolled up and down on the workstation, it becomes evident that the dissection flap rotates around the vessel wall

    Click here to view
  • Double lumen
  • Pseudoaneurysm [[Figure 5]a and b]
Figure 5: (a) Axial base image. Arrows point to the thickened wall and the pseudoaneurysm lying anterior to the vertebral artery lumen. (b) Volume rendered 3D showing the small pseudoaneurysm at the C3/C4 level

Click here to view

The consensus view of CS and ET was recorded.

   Results Top

Thirty-five patients had VAD confirmed on MDCTA in the 4-year period (45 dissected vertebral arteries, 25 left vertebral artery, average age 49.6 ± 13.7 years, 25 males). [Figure 6] shows the age distribution in patients with VAD. 13/28 patients with spontaneous VAD were aged 50 years or above.
Figure 6: Age distribution in decades: Spontaneous stroke group and total group

Click here to view

31/35 patients were identified from the prospective department database for VAD. 2/35 patients were identified on review of all radiological requests and review of all scan results of stroke patients in the study period. 2/35 patients had initial MRI/MRA, and subsequent MDCTA confirmed VAD in both the patients. In the study period, 651 patients investigated for acute stroke had MDCTA as part of their investigation for stroke. 31/651 patients had VAD (4.76% of stroke). 131/651 patients had posterior circulation stroke. 31/131 (24%) of posterior circulation stroke were therefore associated with VAD. In the remaining patients, 45% had a completely normal MDCTA; 9.7% demonstrated vertebral or basilar atheroma; 8% had vertebral artery occlusion/stenosis without wall thickening as per previous defining criteria for VAD; basilar occlusion/stenosis was found in 6.5%, with posterior cerebral artery occlusion/stenosis in 5.7%, and 1 patient had subclavian steal.

4/35 patients had SAH associated with VAD. DSA confirmed the VAD diagnosis in all four patients. In the study period, 628 patients were investigated for SAH. 4/628 of SAH were therefore associated with VAD.

In total, 6/35 patients had DSA following initial MDCTA (all four with SAH and two others in whom the referring clinician requested DSA). All six DSA studies confirmed VAD.

Clinical features of vertebral artery dissection

Patient characteristics and clinical features are summarized in [Table 1]. VAD was a spontaneous event in 32/35 individuals and post-traumatic in three (road traffic accidents). Besides the three with road traffic accidents, two others reported minor trauma prior to presentation. Although other individuals mentioned factors such as odd head positions and exercise, these factors could not be objectively assessed because the distinction between minor trauma and normal daily activities is indistinct. Fifteen patients had headache, 18 had neck pain, but 8 patients had neither of these preceding admission. Thirteen patients had decreased consciousness, including all four with SAH.
Table 1: Clinical features of patients with vertebral artery dissection

Click here to view

Multidetector computed tomography angiography features of vertebral artery dissection

Quality of acquired MDCTA images was satisfactory in all 35 patients with adequate image contrast. Of the few examinations affected by dental amalgam or swallowing artifact, none rendered the examination nondiagnostic. The results are summarized in [Table 2] which includes comparative data from two other studies by Chen et al. and Vertinsky et al. [13],[16]
Table 2: Comparison of series of radiological features of vertebral artery dissection on multidetector computed tomography angiography

Click here to view

The MDCTA features of VAD were increased wall thickness in 44/45 arteries and increased total external vessel diameter in 42/45 arteries. All dissected arteries had either multiple lumenal stenosis (21/45) or associated occlusion (24/45). An intimal flap was detected in only 6/45 dissected vessels while the "classic" double lumen sign was not seen in any of our patients and pseudoaneurysm formation was seen in one artery only. Bilateral dissection was detected in 10/35 patients.

The V3 segment was the most commonly affected (24/45) but multiple segments were affected in 21/45. The V1 segment was not included in the 21 patients who had the limited acquisition and only the 3rd and 4th segments were included in those patients with SAH. Two patients had associated dissection of the internal carotid artery; this was unilateral in one individual, but in the other individual all four cervical vessels (both vertebral and both carotid arteries) were dissected.

Follow-up imaging of arteries

Thirty-two vessels (17 occluded, 15 non-occluded) in 25 patients with ischemic stroke had repeat imaging at an interval, either by MDCTA (17) or MRA (9) (1 patient had both). 14/32 vertebral arteries returned to normal, 4/32 showed improvement in the stenosis and 14/32 did not show a change from the initial imaging.

13/15 of non-occluded vessels became normal or showed improved patency, while only one progressed to occlusion. Only 4/17 occluded arteries showed re-establishment of flow.

   Discussion Top

This is the largest reported series of patients with VAD assessed by MDCTA.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography and vertebral artery dissection

Increased total vessel diameter and vessel wall thickening were present in 93.3 and 97.7% of dissected vertebral arteries, respectively. The absence of an increase in total vessel wall diameter in some dissected arteries may be due to subintimal rather than intramural or subadventitial dissection. Stenosis or occlusion of the vessel lumen was therefore present in all dissected vertebral arteries. In contrast, an intimal flap was found in only six dissected vertebral arteries. The combination of an increase in the total diameter of the vessel in association with wall thickening and luminal stenosis or occlusion is therefore highly suggestive of VAD.

The differential diagnosis of such vessel appearances includes atheroma, but this usually affects multiple vessels, the origins and V2 segments of the vertebral artery, but it is an intimal disease and so it does not increase the total vessel diameter. Vessel wall thickening may also be found in Takayasu arteritis, Behcet disease and giant cell arteritis. These disorders are rare, more frequently affect the carotid arteries and must be considered in appropriate clinical circumstances. [17]

Although our results appear to concur with the observations made by Chen et al., only one patient in our series had aneurysmal dissection as compared to their study which may reflect differences in the populations studied. Bilateral VAD was detected in 25% of our patients as compared to 12-60% reported in the prior series. [10],[13],[18] Multiple vessel involvement was not limited to those with trauma and is recognized occurrence thought to relate to an underlying connective tissue problem.

In our series, MDCTA did not include the arch of the aorta in 21 patients. It was therefore not possible to confirm or exclude dissection involving or limited to the V1 segment, potentially reducing detection of multiple-level VAD. In addition, there may have been potential failure to identify patients with isolated V1 dissection in a proportion of patients in the study period.

Modern CT allows assessment of the entire VA and the combination of base image, MPR and MIP analysis gives access to the complete VA unaffected by any theoretical artifact from its small size or bony confines. VAD could be underestimated by MDCTA where there is occlusion without evidence of an increased overall vessel diameter such as may occur with purely subintimal dissection. Overestimation is unlikely if the defining characteristics as described earlier are applied.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography in comparison to digital subtraction catheter angiography in vertebral artery dissection

DSA when performed in our patients (six patients) confirmed the MDCTA diagnosis in all. In Chen et al.'s previous comparison between DSA and MDCTA in patients with stroke, all 17 patients diagnosed with VAD on DSA had vessel wall thickening. Their reported sensitivity of MDCTA in detecting VAD was 100% with a specificity of 98%, with positive and negative predictive values of 95 and 100%, respectively. We did not undertake a systematic direct comparison of MDCTA with other radiological modalities because MDCTA became the established initial angiographic method in the year 2000 and it would have been unethical to carry out DSA purely for the purposes of comparison. We believe that DSA no longer has any additional role in the diagnosis of VAD and indeed may even be contraindicated because of the possibility of further vessel damage. However, DSA is essential if SAH is the presenting feature or if there is distal basilar occlusion when vascular interventional treatment may be necessary.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging / magnetic resonance angiography in vertebral artery dissection

A recent study has suggested that MDCTA is more accurate in the diagnosis of VAD than MRI/MRA due to the visualization of more diagnostic features. [16]

MDCTA has other practical advantages such as rapid acquisition of information in obtunded or un-cooperative patients, and patients in whom MRI is contraindicated or impossible because of involuntary movement. All standard resuscitative measures can safely be applied to patients in CT unlike the additional restrictions with MRI.

MRI can be useful in confirming hemorrhage in the wall of a dissected vessel. However, disadvantages include its limited spatial resolution, relatively limited area coverage, and the risk of false positive results due to flow related high signal in the venous plexus surrounding the vertebral artery or slow flow within an artery. [14],[19],[20] In contrast, the high spatial resolution and intrinsic tissue attenuation detected by MDCTA enables the differentiation of intramural clot from the contrast-enhanced residual lumen of a vessel, and the detection of calcific atherosclerotic and vaso-occlusive disease of cervical arteries. [13]

We currently use a 64-slice CT and its improved temporal resolution has allowed us to scan all patients, irrespective of their ability to cooperate, from the arch to above the Circle of Willis. The improved spatial resolution has less effect as the diagnosis of VAD is based on the acquired axial slice. However, MIP and other vascular reconstructions are superior and have made the diagnosis of VAD at least subjectively easier for the radiologist.

The ability of MDCTA to simultaneously demonstrate and evaluate pathology throughout the length of all the cervical arteries in one 16-second (4 slice CT) to one 4-second (64 slice CT) examination is an additional advantage over MR, especially so when dissection may be clinically silent and not suspected.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography and subarachnoid hemorrhage

It has been suggested that MDCTA can replace DSA in the initial assessment of patients with SAH. [21] Although non-aneurysmal VAD is a rare cause of SAH (0.63% in this study, and also, 0.63% in a previous report using DSA), accurate diagnosis is important because early re-bleeding is common, especially in those dissections associated with a pseudo aneurysm (31%) with a high mortality if VAD is left untreated. [8] Ramgren et al. reported 5 deaths in 14 patients treated conservatively from a total of 9 deaths in the 29 patients of their series. [8]

In our center, MDCTA is routinely performed as initial assessment of patients suspected of having SAH. If DSA was the initial tool at our center, dissection could potentially be misinterpreted as vasospasm or iatrogenic dissection, potentially delaying correct diagnosis and management.

Vessel recanalization

Previous follow-up studies of VAD indicate that 63-88% of narrowed arteries demonstrate improvement in patency. [10],[22],[23] In our series, 86.6% of stenosed vessels showed normal or improved patency but only 23.5% of occluded VAD recanalized. These observations suggest the potential application of MDCTA in predicting vessel recanalization.

Vertebral artery dissection and stroke

In our series, 4.7% of patients with stroke had VAD as cause of their stroke. This is much higher than that reported in the literature. This may suggest that VAD was more frequent in our study population or that the use of MDCTA in patients with stroke enables improved detection of VAD. Our results also show that stroke due to VAD is often found in the elderly. Twelve of 35 individuals had evidence of secondary embolic occlusion of distal vessels [Table 1].

   Conclusions Top

In conclusion, our series confirms the MDCTA features of VAD and demonstrates that MDCTA can reliably and safely demonstrate the direct and indirect features of VAD. The routine use of MDCTA in stroke increases detection of VAD. MDCTA, therefore, promotes early diagnosis of VAD, facilitating prompt initiation of appropriate management.

   References Top

1.Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med 2001;344:898-906.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Ducrocq X, Lacour JC, Debouverie M, Bracard S, Girard F, Weber M. Cerebral ischemic accidents in young subjects. A prospective study of 296 patients aged 16 to 45 years. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1999;155:575-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Fullerton HJ, Johnston SC, Smith WS. Arterial dissection and stroke in children. Neurology 2001;57:1155-60.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Menon R, Kerry S, Norris JW, Markus HS. Treatment of cervical artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:1122-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Nazir FS, Muir KW. Prolonged interval between vertebral artery dissection and ischemic stroke. Neurology 2004;62:1646-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Caplan LR. Dissections of brain-supplying arteries. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2008;4:34-42.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Shin YS, Kim HS, Kim SY. Stenting for vertebrobasilar dissection: a possible treatment option for nonhemorrhagic vertebrobasilar dissection. Neuroradiology 2007;49:149-56.  Back to cited text no. 7
8.Ramgren B, Cronqvist M, Romner B, Brandt L, Holtås S, Larsson EM. Vertebrobasilar dissection with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective study of 29 patients. Neuroradiology 2005;47:97-104.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Provenzale JM. Dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1099-104.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Pelkonen O, Tikkakoski T, Leinonen S, Pyhtinen J, Lepojärvi M, Sotaniemi K. Extracranial internal carotid and vertebral artery dissections: angiographic spectrum, course and prognosis. Neuroradiology 2003;45:71-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Kurokawa Y, Yonemasu Y, Kano H, Sasaki T, Inaba K. The usefulness of 3D-CT angiography for the diagnosis of spontaneous vertebral artery dissection-report of two cases. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2000;24:115-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Charbonneau F, Gauvrit JY, Touze E, Moulin T, Bracard S, Leclerc X, et al. Diagnosis and follow-up of cervical arterial dissections--results of the SFNV-SFNR study. J Neuroradiol 2005;32:255-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Chen CJ, Tseng YC, Lee TH, Hsu HL, See LC. Multisection CT angiography compared with catheter angiography in diagnosing vertebral artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:769-74.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Mascalchi M, Bianchi MC, Mangiafico S, Ferrito G, Puglioli M, Marin E, et al. MRI and MR angiography of vertebral artery dissection. Neuroradiology 1997;39:329-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Puchner S, Haumer M, Rand T, Reiter M, Minar E, Lammer J, Bucek RA. CTA in the detection and quantification of vertebral artery pathologies: a correlation with color Doppler sonography. Neuroradiology 2007;49:645-50.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Vertinsky AT, Schwartz NE, Fischbein NJ, Rosenberg J, Albers GW, Zaharchuk G. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1753-60.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Rodallec MH, Marteau V, Gerber S, Desmottes L, Zins M. Craniocervical arterial dissection: spectrum of imaging findings and differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2008;28:1711-28.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Mas JL, Bousser MG, Hasboun D, Laplane D. Extracranial vertebral artery dissections: a review of 13 cases. Stroke 1987;18:1037-47.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Bloem BR, Van Buchem GJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and vertebral artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;67: 691-2.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Auer A, Felber S, Schmidauer C, Waldenberger P, Aichner F. Magnetic resonance angiographic and clinical features of extracranial vertebral artery dissection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:474-81.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Hoh BL, Cheung AC, Rabinov JD, Pryor JC, Carter BS, Ogilvy CS. Results of a prospective protocol of computed tomographic angiography in place of catheter angiography as the only diagnostic and pretreatment planning study for cerebral aneurysms by a combined neurovascular team. Neurosurgery 2004;54:1329-40.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Kasner SE, Hankins LL, Bratina P, Morgenstern LB. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrates vascular healing of carotid and vertebral artery dissections. Stroke 1997;28:1993-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Mokri B. Traumatic and spontaneous extracranial internal carotid artery dissections. J Neurol 1990;237:356-61.  Back to cited text no. 23


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Evaluation of isolated abdominal visceral artery dissection with multi-scale spiral computed tomography: a retrospective case series
Qizhou He, Fei Yu, Yajun Fu, Bin Yang, Ran Huo, Rong Xian, Shulan Liu, Kali Liang, Guangcai Tang
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2021; 16(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A case of multiple Vertebrobasilar artery fenestration misdiagnosed as vertebral artery dissection
Feng Wang, Xiaokai Wang, Xiaohua Li, Huifeng Zheng, Zhiyong Zhang
BMC Neurology. 2020; 20(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Nonaneurysmal cerebrovascular conditions associated with intracranial arterial fenestrations
SalimaB Alsaadi, SamerS Hoz, SaadAbdul Kareem Mohammed Al-Obaidi, BahaaS Abdalnaby, AmmarM Al-Smaysim
Mustansiriya Medical Journal. 2020; 19(1): 25
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Bilateral vertebral artery dissection complicated by posterior circulation stroke in a young man
Zhichao Li, Junni Liu, Xiang Wang, Xiaohui Liu, Qinjian Sun, Yifeng Du, Ling Yin
Medicine. 2020; 99(44): e22822
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Letter to the Editor. Computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury
Ajay Malhotra, Xiao Wu, Long Tu, Kimberly Seifert
Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018; 129(1): 265
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Diagnosis of Dissection of the Coronary Artery Dissection by Multidetector Computed Tomography
Yibo Sun,Dingbiao Mao,Fang Lu,Yang Chen,Kailei Shi,Lin Qi,Xingui Guo,Yanqing Hua
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2015; 39(4): 572
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Vascular Pathology in the Extracranial Vertebral Arteries in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
L. Bentsen, A. Nygård, C. Ovesen, A. Christensen, S. Rosenbaum, I. Havsteen, H. Christensen
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra. 2014; 4(1): 19
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Fenestration and duplication of the vertebral artery
Michal Polguj,Michal Podgórski,Kazimierz Jedrzejewski,Miroslaw Topol,Agata Majos
Clinical Anatomy. 2013; 26(8): 933
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 MR diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection: value of 3D time-of-flight and true fast imaging with steady-state precession fusion imaging
Masafumi Kidoh,Takeshi Nakaura,Hiroki Takashima,Makoto Yoshikawa,Shouzaburou Uemura,Kazunori Harada,Toshinori Hirai,Yasuyuki Yamashita
Insights into Imaging. 2013; 4(1): 135
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (839 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Patients and Methods
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded85    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal