Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
: 2015  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 449--450

Chiari 1.5: A lesser known entity

Amita Malik, Ranjan Chandra, Ritu Misra, Brij Bhushan Thukral 
 Department of Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Amita Malik
A-302 Manas Apartments, Mayur Vihar Phase-1, Delhi - 110 091

How to cite this article:
Malik A, Chandra R, Misra R, Thukral BB. Chiari 1.5: A lesser known entity.Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2015;18:449-450

How to cite this URL:
Malik A, Chandra R, Misra R, Thukral BB. Chiari 1.5: A lesser known entity. Ann Indian Acad Neurol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Jan 29 ];18:449-450
Available from:

Full Text

 Case description

A 14-year-old child presented with intermittent neck pain and gradually progressive weakness in right upper limb for 4 years. The weakness had started with right hand and gradually progressed to involve the forearm and arm. This was followed by lower limb weakness on the same side for about 6 months. There was no history of trauma, fever, or lumbar puncture. No signs of raised intracranial tension, meningitis, or cranial nerve involvement were seen.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed herniation of the tonsils 19.5 mm below the foramen magnum along with the brain stem herniation causing flattening of the medulla anteroposteriorly. This descent was measured in relation to the Mc Rae line drawn from the basion to the opisthion, that is, anterior margin to the posterior margin of foramen magnum. Obex was seen to lie 12mm below the foramen magnum [Figure 1]. There was dorsal bump at the cervicomedullary junction [Figure 2]. There was crowding at the foramen magnum with obliteration of subarachnoid space [Figure 3]. Syrinx was present in the spinal cord from C2 to D2 level. Osseous abnormalities observed were retroflexion of the odontoid process and scoliosis of the cervicodorsal spine [Figure 4].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}{Figure 4}


Traditionally the Chiari malformations include four separate anatomical entities, all of which involve the hindbrain. [1] Type I is defined as inferior displacement of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum into the cervical canal. A displacement of more than 5 mm below the foramen magnum after the age of 15 years is considered pathologic. Pointed configuration of cerebellar tonsils is typical.

Type II which is also known as the Arnold-Chiari malformation involves displacement of brainstem and lower cerebellum into the cervical spinal canal. The fourth ventricle is caudally displaced and extends below the foramen magnum. It is nearly always associated with lumbar myelomenigocele. Supratentorial anomalies are commonly seen. These include falx hypoplasia, hydrocephalus, callosal hypogenesis, fused enlarged massa intermedia, colpocephaly, abnormal gyral pattern, and Luckenschadel skull.

Chiari III malformation is characterized by herniation of posterior fossa contents in an occipital or high cervical encephalocele and other features of Chiari II malformation.

Type IV is described as cerebellar hypoplasia or aplasia.

It has been realized over the years that findings in some patients do not exactly fit into these morphological entities. Recently, entities such as Chiari 0 and 1.5 have been described. [2] The essential difference between Chiari I and 1.5 is the presence of caudal descent of the brainstem in the latter in addition to tonsillar ectopia. [3] There is substantial clinical overlap between the two entities. However, younger age at presentation and more severe symptoms like bulbar signs are more common in Chiari 1.5. [4] The differentiation between the two entities is important for appropriate management as Chiari 1.5 patients are more likely to require extensive and complex surgeries as adjunct to decompression.

Essential neuroimaging feature of Chiari 1.5 is the descent of obex and cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum. Syringohydromyelia is often present and tends to be persistent after posterior fossa decompression. Bone abnormalities frequently seen are basilar invagination, atlantooccipital fusion, scoliosis, retroflexed odontoid, abnormal clivus-canal angle. [5] Abnormal clivus-canal angle is a measurement of ventral brain compression. It is formed by intersection of a line along the clivus with a line constructed along the posterior surface of axis body. [6] It has been found that Chiari 1.5 patients with clivus-canal angle of <125° together with basilar invagination require more complex surgery in addition to the standard decompression. [7]

In conclusion, this article is an attempt to present a relatively lesser known entity in Chiari spectrum which is important to recognize because of differences in management and prognosis.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

None declared.


1Caldwell DL, Dubose CO, White TB. Chiari malformations. Radiol Technol 2009;80:340-54.
2Tubbs RS, Elton S, Grabb P, Dockery SE, Bartolucci AA, Oakes WJ. Analysis of the posterior fossa in children with the Chiari 0 malformation. Neurosurgery 2001;48:1050-5.
3Tubbs RS, Iskandar BJ, Bartolucci AA, Oakes WJ. A critical analysis of the Chiari 1.5 malformation. J Neurosurg 2004;101:179-83.
4Moore HE, Moore KR. Magnetic resonance imaging features of complex Chiari malformation variant of Chiari 1 malformation. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44:1403-11.
5Brockmeyer DL. The complex Chiari: Issues and management strategies. Neurol Sci 2011;32:S345-7.
6Smoker WR. Craniovertebral junction: Normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics 1994;14:255-77.
7Bollo RJ, Riva-Cambrin J, Brockmeyer MM, Brockmeyer DL. Complex Chiari malformations in children: An analysis of preoperative risk factors for occipitocervical fusion. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;10:134-41.